SecurityCertified

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Wednesday, July 14, 2010

Network Forensics Vendors: Get in the Cloud!

Posted on 6:47 PM by Unknown
I know some of us worry that the advent of the "cloud" will spell the end of Network Security Monitoring and related network-centric visibility and instrumentation measures. I have a proposal for any network forensics vendors reading this blog: get in the cloud!

For example, imagine you are a proxy-in-the-cloud (PITC) provider, like ScanSafe, now owned by Cisco. You provide a Web portal to your customers so they can see what bad sites employees were not allowed to visit. But what about all the subtle traffic that evaded your filters, block lists, heuristics, and other defensive mechanisms? What about the insider stealing intellectual property, indistinguishable from a "normal employee?" How does your abuse-centric Web portal address the sorts of threats that really matter?

To me, one answer is to deploy a network forensics solution like NetWitness or Solera in front of your PITC infrastructure. The PITC vendor must have a way to identify legitimate clients, or else you've created the world's greatest open Web proxy. Use the identity information to tag the traffic collected by the network forensics product.

When a customer needs to analyze an intrusion, or conduct an investigation, he can connect to the hosted network forensics platform.

I also like this approach because it helps address the consumerization of IT. You can create a policy (weak I know, but it's an option) that Company users must point any device that processes Company data to the PITC infrastructure for Web access. By doing so you can collect the network forensic data you need.

Of course, encryption is always an issue, but if really necessary I'm sure you can work with the PITC vendor on a MITM approach.

I'm sure I'll get a few comments from critics saying "NSM is dead," "network traffic is worthless," etc. It's just a sign you don't know how to use that sort of data effectively, and probably never will. After evangelizing for 10 years, I've given up trying to convince critics like that.

I also don't intend for this post to be a signal that I hate logs or host-based evidence. It's just another piece in the puzzle.

So, network forensics vendors, who will be the first to publish a press release saying you've partnered with a PITC provider?
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in cloud, nsm | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Review of Intelligence, 4th Ed Posted
    Amazon.com just posted my five star review of Intelligence: From Secrets to Policy, 4th Ed by Mark Lowenthall . From the review : I was a...
  • DojoCon Videos Online
    Props to Marcus Carey for live streaming talks from DojoCon . I appeared in my keynote , plus panels on incident response and cloud secur...
  • A Book for the Korean Cyber Armies
    I've got a book for the Korean cyber armies, North and South. That's right, it's my first book , The Tao of Network Security Mo...
  • Practice of Network Security Monitoring Table of Contents
    Since many of you have asked, I wanted to provide an updated Table of Contents for my upcoming book, The Practice of Network Security Monito...
  • Mandiant APT1 Report: 25 Best Commentaries of the Last 12 Days
    Two weeks ago today our team at Mandiant was feverishly preparing the release of our APT1 report . In the twelve days that followed public...
  • Tort Law on Negligence
    If any lawyers want to contribute to this, please do. In my post Shodan: Another Step Towards Intrusion as a Service , some comments claim ...
  • Bejtlich's Thoughts on "Why Our Best Officers Are Leaving"
    Twenty-two years ago today I flew to Colorado Springs, CO and reported for Basic Cadet Training with the class of 1994 at the United States ...
  • My Role in Information Warfare during the Yugoslav Wars
    This morning I read a Tweet from @AirForceAssoc reminding me that: Today in Airpower History, August 30, 1995: NATO and U.S. aircraft bega...
  • Review of Crypto Posted
    Amazon.com just posted my four star review of Crypto by Steven Levy. From the review : Steven Levy's "Crypto" is a fascinati...
  • APT Presentation from July 2008
    Some of you may remember me mentioning the 2008 SANS WhatWorks in Incident Response and Forensic Solutions Summit organized by Rob Lee. I ...

Categories

  • afcert
  • Air Force
  • analysis
  • announcement
  • apt
  • attribution
  • bestbook
  • blackhat
  • books
  • breakers
  • bro
  • bruins
  • certification
  • china
  • cisco
  • cissp
  • cloud
  • clowns
  • commodore
  • conferences
  • controls
  • correlation
  • counterintelligence
  • cybercommand
  • cyberwar
  • dfm
  • education
  • engineering
  • feds
  • fisma
  • freebsd
  • GE
  • ge-cirt
  • hakin9
  • history
  • impressions
  • information warfare
  • ipv6
  • law
  • leadership
  • malware
  • mandiant
  • microsoft
  • mssp
  • nsm
  • offense
  • oisf
  • packetstash
  • philosophy
  • pirates
  • powerpoint
  • press
  • psirt
  • reading
  • redteam
  • reviews
  • russia
  • sans
  • sec
  • sguil
  • snorby
  • spying
  • threat model
  • threats
  • Traffic Talk
  • training
  • tufte
  • tv
  • ubuntu
  • usenix
  • verizon
  • vulnerabilities
  • wisdom
  • writing

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (16)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2012 (60)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (5)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (10)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (6)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (9)
    • ►  February (6)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2011 (108)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (7)
    • ►  October (11)
    • ►  September (9)
    • ►  August (18)
    • ►  July (10)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (13)
    • ►  March (17)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (9)
  • ▼  2010 (193)
    • ►  December (14)
    • ►  November (11)
    • ►  October (6)
    • ►  September (16)
    • ►  August (15)
    • ▼  July (26)
      • Time Issues in Libpcap Traces
      • Review of Digital Forensics for Network, Internet,...
      • Review of Virtualization and Forensics Posted
      • Review of Digital Triage Forensics Posted
      • Dell Needs a PSIRT
      • Review of The Watchman Posted
      • Review of The Fugitive Game Posted
      • Review of At Large Posted
      • Review of The Cuckoo's Egg Posted
      • Review of Code Version 2.0 Posted
      • Review of Crypto Posted
      • Review of The Illusion of Due Diligence Posted
      • Human Language as the New Programming Language
      • Brief Thoughts on WEIS 2010
      • Brief Thoughts on SANS WhatWorks Summit in Forensi...
      • Network Forensics Vendors: Get in the Cloud!
      • Gartner on CSIRTs
      • My Article on Advanced Persistent Threat Posted
      • A Little More on Cyberwar, from Joint Pub 1
      • Thoughts on "Application SOC" and New MSSPs
      • Ponemon Institute Misses the Mark
      • Joint Strike Fighter -- Face of Cyberwar?
      • Cyberwar Is Real
      • Security Is Never Free -- Ask DNSSEC
      • Lessons from NETOPS vs CND
      • Secunia Survey of DEP and ASLR
    • ►  June (15)
    • ►  May (15)
    • ►  April (15)
    • ►  March (16)
    • ►  February (19)
    • ►  January (25)
  • ►  2009 (123)
    • ►  December (10)
    • ►  November (17)
    • ►  October (21)
    • ►  September (13)
    • ►  August (20)
    • ►  July (21)
    • ►  June (21)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile